Ever since Charles Darwin wrote down his observations of the niche traits of isolated galapagos animals compiling them into his book “On the Origin of Species,” humans have wondered if they are the best and smartest creatures on Earth. The fact that we can even pose this question argues that we are better than every other species and thus we made a chart and declared ourselves as the most evolved intelligent species on Earth. This hubris creates a sense of superiority in our genome which could override obvious continuity issues in the theory like the missing link or continued existence of chimps. Evolution has been taught the same way since its inception in 1859 and it has grown in popularity and become a staple in the American education system despite only being a speculative theory. We are learning new things about animal consciousness every day which might disprove our current theory of evolution yet mainstream science seems to silence novel ideas and stipple the flow of science by investing itself fully in this theory that lacks evidence to be considered fact.
Charles Darwin himself would remind us that evolution is merely a theory and we should keep our minds open to science if we are ever going to unlock the mysteries of our origins. Regardless of his beliefs however, the rest of science seems to really like this theory. There has never been a theory that was so quickly supported and promoted by the scientific community other than evolution. Since writing “On the Origin of Species” Darwin’s ideas have rarely been challenged or built upon yet they remain nothing more than scientific theory. This ideological monopoly has pushed its way into every aspect of science and become a pillar of knowledge in today's society. Propagated through our own hubris and need to dominate, this current theory of evolution will do our species no favors when our lack of searching uncovers something unknown.
The current theory of evolution states that we all began as one single celled organism floating somewhere in the frothy soup that was the prehistoric ocean. Eventually that cell split into two and those two split into four for billions of years before they grew legs and walked onto land. Some became giant lizards and dinosaurs, others had feathers and hollow bones which allowed them to fly while, according to theory, our nearest ancestors were dirty rats and moles crawling across the mud in fear that they might be eaten. Some extinction event be it an asteroid or volcano or ice age came and decimated the larger species whilst us tiny mammals lived to see another day. Over another billion years we continued to grow and evolve becoming mammoths and saber tooth tigers, wolves, cows and eventually monkeys and apes before we see the bipedal hominids we know as humans today.
“My earliest ancestor”
Futurists like Ray Kurzweil believe our next stage of evolution involves technology. In their eyes we have evolved to our limits physically and now need to build computers and simulators to reach our next stage of evolution. They believe that death and mortality is avoidable if we can build a system of computers and download our consciousness into a simulated world where we can live forever. In their vision of the future we will move past our bodies and live immortal lives in a world where we can create whatever we want. Their goal is to try and force the next stage of evolution by going over the technological horizon known as the singularity. At that point we will be able to solve all of our issues instantly and move into a utopian future for immortal lives with no conflict. Just like in the matrix.
“The ideal living situation”
Anyway, give or take a few details and specifics that is essentially the theory of evolution that was presented and accepted then and is being taught today. As it currently sits this theory raises multiple questions to someone like me while also ignoring what seems obvious in accordance with itself. Though mainstream scientists and the heads of academia seem opposed to researching and exploring the theory of evolution, I control my own platform which needs content for new posts so I will dive in and expose evolution for what it is. A contrived theory based on natural adaptations used to degrade human morality through satanic egoism which individualizes us and separates our souls from the planet and its creator.
Evolution is a theory despite it being accepted by the zeitgeist of the time it is still only theory. Theory is a supposition or a system of ideas intended to explain something. Theory is an explanation for why a subject should undergo the scientific method to either prove or disprove its hypothesis. Theory is not a fact of nature in this state and only becomes one after being objectively proven to be true. This is why we don't refer to the rotation of the planet as the theory of Earth’s rotation. The theory of evolution has disguised itself as fact with the aid of educational propaganda. It was chosen as the only realistic alternative to the story of creation which the satanic elite needed to disprove in order to push along their nefarious agenda.
Charles Darwin was probably unaware of this diabolical plan when he took that trip and found himself on the Galapagos Islands in 1835 where he initially made his observations on adaptation and theorized how they play into natural selection. After graduating college Darwin was invited by Captain Robert Fitzroy to join as a naturalist on a round the world voyage aboard the HMS Beagle. Darwin’s father objected to the voyage, regarding it as a waste of his son's time but nonetheless was persuaded by his brother-in-law and he agreed to fund the journey. The voyage of the HMS Beagle lasted just under five years, traveling from Wales the crew followed the Eastern American coastline South around Cape Horn then North up the Western South American coastline before heading West around the Australian and Asian coastlines.
While the main crew were charting coastlines Darwin, the naturalist on board, would go ashore and document the flora and fauna he found. He described the characteristics of many species in his journal, drawing them along with observations he made. Along the way he found many species that had never been documented, especially when the expedition came across the Galapagos Islands which were previously uncharted on the European atlas. On the Galapagos he observed many unique species with traits and features he hadn’t observed elsewhere. He found these species had niche traits differing from island to island and he theorized that these traits were adapted genetically over time. These observations are in a large part what he wrote about in, “On the Origin of Species,” which later turned into his theory of natural selection.
The theory of natural selection is often referred to as “survival of the fittest” and has to do with the strongest genetics of a species being passed down to the next generation. Natural selection therefore can change a species based on which genetics rise to the top. In the Galapagos for example he noticed certain species of finches had curved beaks which allowed them to dig into trees and eat bugs. One can speculate that this physical trait was passed down because fiches without these beaks couldn’t eat and would die off. Over time the majority of finches on this island have adapted this trait where other finches in the world have not. These finches have not evolved to have this curved beak but rather adapted the trait over time, adaptation and evolution are not synonymous.
“Honestly I think Darwin was just bored.”
Adaptation can be seen in a variety of species all over the world with niche traits usually affected by their environments. One of the quickest species to show visible adaptations are pigs. Domesticated pigs are typically friendly, hairless, fat animals who enjoy leisure activities. When released in the wild in just two generations pigs become hogs who grow large tusks, slimmer, more muscular, hairy bodies, and become much more aggressive in nature. Pigs and hogs are the same species who have adapted different traits in order to properly survive in their unique environments. The adaptive change between domestic cattle and bison is also there though it takes many more generations to achieve. This is what Darwin was observing in the finches and tortoises on the Galapagos Islands, what is often attributed as his theory of evolution would be better described as a theory of adaptation, which would probably graduate from the label of theory to fact.
“This is all the same species”
Darwin's Theory of Natural Selection has nothing to do with evolution, he himself believed in divine creation and never used the term to describe any of his observations. He attributed a species ability to adapt as proof of a divine hand used in creation. Adaptation explained how humans are the same species regardless of racial identity during the time of phrenological studies claiming whites to be the dominant species. Phrenology relies on evolution as it states certain races are less evolved than others and therefore are worthy of enslavement. This theory of phrenology is the basis of evolution and both are not only racist and used to dehumanize large populations of mostly indigenous cultures but they also make no sense as they fail to explain why apes are still present if we evolved from them. If the best traits are passed down and the others die then no species we evolved from should exist today.
Regardless of Darwin's opinions, beliefs or work somehow he became the spokesman for the theory of evolution which recent science has started to treat as dogma. The reason science has chosen this theory as dogma has a lot to do with its white supremacy roots. It started as a way for White Anglo Saxon Protestants (Wasps) to justify their colonial dominance over much of the undeveloped world. It was justification for racially driven slavery and an easy way to sow seeds of racism among the lower class of impoverished citizens after slavery’s abolishment. Most importantly it is used to further the divide between us and the divine being who created us in His image and put us here to be shepards to this planet.
We use evolution as a way to explain what without God would appear to be a random place in nature. By demoralizing us into animals no different from rats and spiders they destroy our self esteem and dismantle our ability to organize together against what we know is wrong. This keeps us fighting among each other over trivial issues distracting us from their systematic destruction of the planet. Evolution is used to justify their endless greed for natural resources such as lithium ion which they mine through the most destructive mining practices ever seen. These forces of evil get us to believe it is not only their right to hoard resources but our nature as humans to do so. They act as though the planet birthed us to destroy it as opposed to us being created to protect it. True evolution can be observed in the life cycle of an individual frog as it goes from a tadpole in the water to a frog on land. We are meant to feel as insignificant as a frog by believing in evolution, removing us from our inevitable place with the creator in the afterlife and exchanging it with an indeterminate sentence stuck on this prison planet.
“It gets worse with each incarnation.”
The theory of evolution is to this day only a theory which creates an endless string of questions to be answered if it will ever be proven as fact. Most obviously would be the missing link which scientists studying evolution believe is the key to proving their theory however while many subsequent species of sapiens have been discovered none have been this supposed missing link. Another simple question one can ask was mentioned earlier is why are apes still around today if our species supposedly evolved from theirs. When a frog becomes a tadpole there are no longer tadpoles until she lays her eggs but our offspring are not apes and even if we share some lines of DNA code, our ancestors were not apes either. One of the biggest questions that seems to go ignored in regards to evolution is the possibility that if we evolved this far on land then wouldn’t there be a species that evolved this far or further without ever leaving the ocean?
“We don’t know whats down there.”
As previously stated, according to evolution we all started as a single celled organism which split apart and evolved into all the species on the planet. This organism started in water and eventually grew legs and walked on land evolving through the lineage of mammals before becoming the human beings we are today. There was a split in our lineage when we left the water for land yet there are still mammals in the ocean today which would suggest they would evolve at a similar if not quicker rate due to them staying in a familiar environment. If evolution is true then one would assume that there are ocean to land counterparts between mammals. Based on IQ tests we’ve taken, dolphins have very similar intelligence to the great apes in their hunting and problem solving abilities and whales are very similar to elephants in their social and emotional connections. If we can draw these lines between ocean and land mammals and if we as sapiens evolved from those same mammals then do we have an ocean dwelling evolutionary counterpart as well?
Is there a species comparable to our intelligence living somewhere in the ocean, have they died out or are dolphins a symbol of evolutionary perfection? The legends of Atlantis and mermaids are examples of such a species existing in folkloric tradition. Sea stories told by sailors back in the fifteenth century claim to witness such creatures swimming alongside their ships, singing and speaking to the men aboard. It is generally believed that these are nothing more than tall tales told to Spanish kings to receive more funding for expeditions. Most humans think of fish as stupid because they get caught on hooks by the seduction of food, but when we look at the cancers we get from food dyes, seed oils and glyphosates in seductive looking junk food then the fish on the hook doesn’t look so dumb.
“We are all just fish on a hook.”
It should be noted here that we have only explored about five percent of our oceans which is less than we’ve explored outer space. More than seventy percent of the surface of the Earth is ocean which leaves us with more than two-thirds of the planet being left unexplored. Purely by a hypothetical standpoint the possibility of a species equal to or higher than our intelligence is likely. This species could be the Atlanteans from Plato’s allegory who after getting a taste for the war driven greed of the surface would prefer to remain hidden underwater. If we can support over eight billion people on our small portion of the planet then it's very likely that they could support two or three times that amount in their three dimensional environment. This would make the procreation and proliferation of their Atlantean species very likely, more-so even than our own.
“Our underwater counterparts?”
These Atlanteans are probably more advanced than the primitive trident wielding warriors we typically imagine. The oldest known Octopus fossil dates back nearly three hundred million years meaning octopus, which are typically regarded as the furthest evolved marine species, got to where they are before dinosaurs supposedly walked the Earth. Living under the ocean provides several advantages to a species development compared to life on the surface. The area they inhabit is much larger than we have on the surface which allows them to not only have larger populations but more spread out populations which are less likely to feud with each other. Historically some of our biggest squabbles have been over land and resources such as salt and other spices. The ocean is entirely salt water so it's unlikely they would fight over a substance that surrounds them at all times. As we established they have over two times the land space in a world where they can move without the resistance of gravity making fights over land rights seem highly unlikely.
An underwater society would also be much less likely to be affected by extinction level events such as an asteroid strike, flood or volcanic eruption. Avoiding catastrophic events would not only preserve the population but also the knowledge of an underwater culture. Where we lost the Library of Alexandria and had to rediscover the knowledge lost, they would be able to maintain and advance their knowledge and technologies in perpetuity. Technologies that would have been built under a different set of physical laws and therefore have entirely different potential from what we can build on land. For example propulsion from our understanding starts with the combustion of a fuel in an engine creating energy used to propel a vehicle forward. Underwater propulsion would presumably function entirely differently, perhaps use different fuels than what we know and have incredibly advanced potential. Living beneath the ocean would put this Atlantean species under significantly higher pressure than what's in space meaning whatever propulsion technology created there would likely be able to function better in space and even better still under normal atmospheric pressure.
“This is a fake image.”
There are examples of things spotted under, and even above, the waves that might prove our underwater counterparts do exist. Submariners, pilots, oil rig workers and even crab fishermen have all reported seeing strange unexplainable objects while out at sea. Just like UFO claims corroborated by the pentagon these unidentified submersible objects are seen performing movements and maneuvers that are impossible with our understanding of physics and propulsion. They even resemble the tic-tac, saucer and cigar shaped crafts that are common in UFO lore. According to several government officials, including Luis Elizondo and retired Navy Admiral Tim Galludet, USOs are a very common occurrence in our oceans. As we look further into these sightings many are wondering if what we assumed to be visitors from another world were actually living here with us all along.
Many examples of these objects are still classified so we have only anecdotal stories about what witnesses saw. One such story occured on an offshore oil rig whose name and location are still classified. Just after noon on a sunny summer day many of the crew were terrified by the object they saw and claimed to be at least twice as large as the oil platform they were on. An offshore oil rig platform is on average around 342,000 square feet of usable deck which is larger than an NFL stadium. Observers of the object insist that it was made from a metallic material they had never seen, the object breached the surface and apparently lifted slightly off the water before dipping back under as if it knew it had been seen. Witnesses then report that the object moved swiftly away at an impossible speed without disrupting the water around it.
“This is a classified image that was leaked by whistlebowers.”
Another example we have happened to the crew aboard the USS Trepang, a sturgeon-class nuclear powered submarine that was in comission from 1970-1999. In March of 1979 the USS Trepang was on a joint scientific/military expedition in the Arctic Ocean between Norway and Iceland. Officer John Klika was peering through the periscope when he spotted a large cigar shaped unknown object emerging from the waters nearby. He showed this to Admiral Dean Reynolds who was on duty at the time who ordered his crew to snap a few images of the craft. The amphibious craft raised from the ocean turning itself towards the sky before taking off at incredible speed without making a sound. Witnesses were then silenced and the photos were classified until being leaked by an unknown source in the 1990s.
“This too is a real image.”
Examples of amphibious highly advanced crafts like these are all too common. Another more classified story tells us of a different nuclear submarine which is supposed to be nearly invisible underwater yet was caught in some sort of tractor beam when it crossed paths with one of these USOs. The sub was completely paralyzed yet showed no warning signs. After the USO slowly drifted out of view they were released and able to move again as if nothing had happened. And of course how can we forget the famous Commander David Fravor tic-tac incident which was filmed, tracked, released publically by the New York Times and confirmed to be true by the pentagon. A major feature in that case is that the UAP, while Com. Fravor is locked on, dips under the water and dives about a half mile down before shooting back into the sky. The list goes on when we study cases on the coast we see that almost eighty percent involve the object diving into the ocean.
“Real images from the tic tac incident, on the left it is underwater then seconds later it is back in the clouds.”
There is simply too much evidence to assume that there are no intelligent species living under the sea. If evolution is real and we have really only explored such a small portion of the ocean, then believing there is not a highly developed intelligent species and culture living in the ocean would retard the whole field of evolutionary biology. As discussed, if evolution is real then it's likely that there is a species in the ocean without the catastrophic resets that has evolved further than us not just physically, emotionally or mentally but technologically. They’ve chosen to separate themselves from our tendencies toward greed and violence only to be inevitably affected by our pollution and overfishing. By poisoning their environment we can only assume that we have provoked them to defend themselves which leads us to the war with UFOs that I claimed would never happen.
War with the Atlanteans is going to be tough especially since the majority of land lubbers don’t believe they exist. They are in the ultimate position for a preemptive strike and with their technological advances we are helpless to their attack. They could vaporize us, glass the surface or bomb all our major cities then spend years hunting and enslaving the survivors but the best strategy for waging war is to wage a war that only you know you’re a part of. Like the MK Ultra plot to hypnotize and sterilize us with blue light, the Atlanteans have the opportunity to attack without ever attacking. By slightly raising the temperature of the ocean they will melt the poles and flood our world as we know it. The majority of us will die in a deluge of biblical proportions because it will happen too fast for us to adapt and evolve in order to survive. Any lubbers left will be reset to the stone age giving the Atlanteans another hundred thousand years or so until they have to do it again.
“There will be few survivors after the deluge.”
That is of course only true if you believe in evolution which I, like Charles Darwin, do not believe in. When one studies biology down to the quantum level it becomes clear that life is not some random product but a phenomenally engineered creation. Like the way nature provides prey to feed predators to the way a banana fits in your hand down to the way mitochondria in our cells produce lectins from sunlight to fix inflammation in our bodies from consuming unnatural foods it is clear that this is all connected and was likely created as a part of some greater whole. Our minds get hung up on the idea of a creator because it's hard to imagine some old white engineer in the clouds putting us together piece by piece but this is not the case for creation. St. Thomas Aquinas, one of the most intelligent people to ever live (and the original enemy of automation), stated that “we do not know what God is,” which is to say the creator is not a physical being but something greater than we can imagine. The creator is omnipresent in the universe which is to say He is the universe itself.
The Big Bang Theory which is often cited as the scientific proof behind the evolution of our universe and planet is actually a Jesuit concept. The Jesuits are a group of Catholic priests, theologians and scientists who are much smarter than any secularly educated scholars. Jesuit priests are responsible for many advances in technology such as seismographs to study earthquakes, vaccines to cure illnesses like small pox and malaria, telescopes which we use to study the universe and anatomy which we use to study ourselves. According to them The Big Bang Theory is one of the greatest examples of the divine creation of our universe. It is an example of Catholic dogma being forgotten through sciencentific study. Therefore even the theory of evolution is nothing more than a fancy timeline of God’s creation of us.
The secular version of evolution is a demonic idea used as a way to justify what without God seems like a random placement in nature but when we realize that God is nature itself it becomes clear that we are all indeed created in His image. The theory of evolution is nothing more than one of the devil's tricks like what he used to get Eve to convince Adam to eat the forbidden fruit that got us evicted from the Garden of Eden. Believing this trick of evolution will remove us from the guidance of divine grace and leave us alone in a world of monsters and giants like the one our furthest ancestors lived in. It creates arrogance, greed and evil which we use to conquer, dominate and pollute the world around us. Allowing this idea of evolution to separate us from His divine grace has created a god-complex in the minds of atheistic “futurists” who make it their goal to download souls onto servers to prevent us from merging with our creator in death. But those servers won't survive the Atlantean floods and choosing not to participate in divine assimilation will leave those souls stuck eternally in hell. Which might just be their ultimate plan.
